Remarkable, All Things Considered

Posted October 7th, 2007 by Joe Kaiser

"Ethical Concerns?" I 'bout fell out of my chair.

Dear Rob,

I’ve maintained all along that former Assistant Attorney General Cheryl Kringle acted inappropriately while involved in this investigation.

Her overzealous advocacy showed no bounds.

This, coming from the Office of the Attorney General of the State of Washington, is inexcusable.

The List

So, I thought I’d start making a list of things Ms. Kringle said or did that were improper and reveal what I consider to be unethical behavior.

Admittedly, some of these things may not be directly attributible to her, but they did happen under her watch and as such are ultimately her responsibility.

1. Falsely claiming this investigation has something to do with the 2003 “consumer complaint” by John R. Matson.

2. Falsely claiming there were “seven or eight” complaints filed against me or my company when in fact there were zero actual complaints (may have been her cohort).

3. Contriving a Consumer Protection Act violation lawsuit against me where no consumer had complained about any transaction in which I’d participated.

4. Falsely claiming Fiscal Dynamics “does not provide a valuable service to Washington property owners.”

5. Falsely stating people with whom I partnered to save their properties believe all I’d done was made them loans.

6. Laughing at a homeowner who’d called to ask she promise not to come after me for assisting them in saving their home (she refused to, but I saved it anyway).

7. Attempting to convince sellers I’m some sort of scam artist by implying what I do as an foreclosure investor is unfair to them.

8. Attempting to convince my private lenders that investing their money in foreclosure properties is somehow improper.

9. Attempting to have the malicious press release “optimized” for my name so it would more readily be displayed in search engines.

10. Joking to my attorney prior to depositions about how much money she’d extracted from other business owners in Consumer Protection “restitution plays.”

11. Filing suit against me, after years of investigating, where it is clear to anyone acting fairly and without bias that I’d delivered on every commitment I’d made.

12. Using the power of the office of the AG to terrorize my former partner and convince him to settle or face financial ruin when he had done nothing wrong.

13. Nearly destroying Monte Kline and his business Pacific Health Centers in yet another Consumer Protection Act violation case where there were no consumer complaints and ultimately proved to be without merit, costing the taxpayers of this state upwards of $1,000,000.00.

14. Refusing to admit this entire investigation begins and ends at the doorstep of county prosecutors upset we’ve stumbled onto their turf, tax sale overages, making the investigation 100% agenda driven (and entirely improper).


I’m sure I don’t know the half of what went on behind the scenes. I can only imagine.

But, having experienced the depositions and reviewed the discovery documents and emails to and from my attorneys, that stuff alone is enough to sicken anyone.

My partner and I worked seven years as foreclosure investors, provided an extraordinary service to citizens of this state at risk of losing their homes, delivered on all our promises, and paid every last nickel we’d agreed to pay them.

Our track records speaks for itself and only an idiot would argue otherwise.

Yet today I am sued by your office for millions of dollars because an overzealous consumer advocate with a track record of her own (and it’s not pretty) was somehow put in a position she clearly was incapable of handling.

And then this came in . . .

I recently reviewed a pamphlet regarding an upcoming Living Trust seminar, and noted Ms. Kringle is a speaker.

Her topic?

I’ll let you see for yourself, Rob.


“Ethical Concerns?”

I ’bout fell out of my chair.

In the arena,

Joe Kaiser

6 Responses to: “Remarkable, All Things Considered”

  1. GBK responds:
    Posted: October 7th, 2007 at 12:57 am

    What a farce this case against you is. Does not anyone in the AG’s office have the _ _ _ _ _ or the brains to compose a letter to your attorney bringing this case to an end right now. They spin everything else, surely they can find a way to still make themselves look good. I’d say we WA State tax-payers are the ones being scammed. Maybe we should consider a class-action suit!

  2. Davido responds:
    Posted: October 7th, 2007 at 10:17 am

    Joe, please post the phone # for the AG’s lead official on this case.

  3. Joe Kaiser responds:
    Posted: October 7th, 2007 at 11:00 am


  4. GreG Ritch responds:
    Posted: October 7th, 2007 at 4:45 pm

    Hi Joe. I got your BPF course from Jim this weekend. Like the rest of your stuff, it’s pure genius. But for your case, I would just settle, like you former partner did, it may cost you more in attoney fees, why make these guys rich? I know you know what you are doing, good luck


  5. Joe Kaiser responds:
    Posted: October 7th, 2007 at 4:59 pm


    Glad you like the course. Be sure to let me know how things go.

    As to you advice to “just settle,” you can “just forget it.” Till my dying breath, my friend, if that’s what it takes, I will fight these clowns.


  6. olyguy responds:
    Posted: October 9th, 2007 at 10:21 am

    And thanks for fighting them Joe.

    Thank you so much.

    There’s that famous quote about “for tyranny to succeed, it only needs for good men to stand by.” That is a paraphrased version but it somewhat expresses the idea.

    So thank you for bringing to light the greedy, carniverous, unethical, dishonest, and disgusting acts of the WA AG’s office.

    Where are the newspapers now? Where is the publicity that should be showered on this travesty?

    Well, unlike the AG’s who gets paid whether they are productive or not, or even anti-productive, I need to get onto my projects.

    All the best to you.

    “Embarrassed by our WA Government”

    p.s. One last question: Sam Reed is known as an honest man. Where is he in all of this?

Post a Comment

Enter Your Details:

You may write the following basic XHTML Strict in your comments:
<a href="" title=""></a> · <acronym title=""></acronym> · <abbr title=""></abbr>
<blockquote cite=""></blockquote> · <code></code> · <strong></strong> · <em></em>

  • If you’re a first-time commenter, your response will be moderated.
  • If your response includes a link, it will require moderator approval.
Enter Your Comments:

Note: This is the end of the usable page. The image(s) below are preloaded for performance only.