On this page the following entries were made in the “Sugarman” category.
Archive for “Sugarman”
Can You Spot the Scam?
Yeah, we screwed them over, and good.
Dear Rob,
I’ve sent Jim a link to the Partnership Deal closing we did way back in 2003 or 04.
In fact, I’ll post it here so we can all take a look.
I thought as long as it’s up we might all play, “Spot the Scam,” and unless I miss my guess, AAG Jim Sugarman will be the winner, hands-down.
Continue reading “Can You Spot the Scam?” »
Women (and Jim) at Work
. . . imagine how Jim Sugarman will now take their month long adventure and twist it into something vile.
Dear Rob,
Received a copy of Jim Sugarman’s six-page letter asking for more and more discovery items.
Apparently, the 41,000 pages he admits to having gone through to date aren’t quite enough.
So, once again, I’m on it and will attempt to provide him everything he’s asked for, per my attorney’s instructions, including the Jenna and Clare videos.
Continue reading “Women (and Jim) at Work” »
“A Very Simple Bill”
And, if it's so simple, can you at least fix your own press releases?
Dear Rob,
Apparently, the way to get complicated, unwieldly, inartfully drafted legislation passed is to pretend it’s anything but.
Perfect example?
Your Assistant Attorney General describing HB 279 as “a very simple bill.” It’s not, as he knows all too well.
Continue reading ““A Very Simple Bill”” »
The Usual Suspects
With only two days left, you can't call the lender, according to David Huey.
Dear Rob,
We talked yesterday about why someone in foreclosure would do a leaseback type deal, receiving “no money.”
Does this type of deal really make no sense, compared to losing one’s home to foreclosure?
What if foreclosure is in 48 hours or less?
Continue reading “The Usual Suspects” »
The “Core Problem”
The only reason someone would sell their house for no money is because they were promised the opportunity to buy it back.
Dear Rob,
AAG Jim Sugarman is at it again.
He’s testified before the legislature regarding the new foreclosure law, demonstrating the cloud of confusion your office is operating under.
What our bill (HB 2791) does . . . is address the core problem . . . people were being convinced to sell their house for no money. No money whatsoever.— AAG James Sugarman
Consumer Protection Division
That’s what you think happens and that’s what you consider the core problem?
Ugh, no Jim.
Continue reading “The “Core Problem”” »
